Aburto v. Clark
| 5:2006cv00640 |
| June 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a conditional writ of habeas corpus is granted as follows: Unless Petitioner is resentenced within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of the Judgment (plus any additional delay authorized under state law), Respondent shall discharge petitioner from all adverse consequences of his conviction in Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. RIF 096321. 79 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas courpus is denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 , R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 21 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aburto v. Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
