Robert C Almond et al v. Northwest Pipe Company et al
| David V Diaz, Robert C Almond, Jean C Morris and Mark Anthony Perez |
| Northwest Pipe Company and Does |
| 5:2007cv00198 |
| February 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| Alameda |
| Stephen G. Larson |
| John Charles Rayburn |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson, in favor of David V Diaz, Jean C Morris, Mark Anthony Perez, Robert C Almond against Northwest Pipe Company Related to: Stipulation to Vacate 118 . Plaintiffs shall recover from defendant Northwest Pipe Company as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Defendant Northwest Pipe Company shall pay plaintiffs' counsel $68,295.60 in attorneys' fees and $10,159.70 in costs. (See document for specifics) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
117
JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson, in favor of plaintiffs David V Diaz, Jean C Morris, Mark Anthony Perez, Robert C Almond against Northwest Pipe Company. Plaintiffs shall recover from defendant Northwest Pipe Company as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Defendant shall pay plaintiffs' counsel in $68,295.60 in attorneys' fees and costs according to proof. (See document for specifics)(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
