Aurtis Tucker v. Teamster Local No 986 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
| Aurtis Tucker |
| Teamster Local No 986 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters |
| 5:2007cv00603 |
| May 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Stephen G. Larson |
| Oswald Parada |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aurtis Tucker v. Teamster Local No 986 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aurtis Tucker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teamster Local No 986 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters | |
| Represented By: | George A Pappy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
