Hudson Insurance Company v. Colony Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Hudson Insurance Company v. Colony Insurance Company

Hudson Insurance Company v. Colony Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Hudson Insurance Company
Defendant:	Colony Insurance Company
Case Number:	5:2007cv01497
Filed:	November 14, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County:	XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge:	Stephen G. Larson
Presiding Judge:	Oswald Parada
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2009	Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That Plaintiff is entitled to equitable contribution from Defendant in the amount of 477,149.80; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest in the amount of $87,225.75 (as of June 23, 2008) and $261.45 per day for each day thereafter until the earlier of when judgment is entered in this action or the equitable contribution is paid.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)
October 1, 2008	Filing 47 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FORSUMMARY JUDGMENT held before Judge Stephen G. Larson: Due to congestion of the Court's calendar, the Court CONTINUES the hearing on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment from October 6, 2008, to December 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom One of the above-reference Court. before Judge Stephen G. Larson (am)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2009

Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That Plaintiff is entitled to equitable contribution from Defendant in the amount of 477,149.80; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest in the amount of $87,225.75 (as of June 23, 2008) and $261.45 per day for each day thereafter until the earlier of when judgment is entered in this action or the equitable contribution is paid.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)

October 1, 2008

Filing 47 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PARTIES' CROSS MOTIONS FORSUMMARY JUDGMENT held before Judge Stephen G. Larson: Due to congestion of the Court's calendar, the Court CONTINUES the hearing on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment from October 6, 2008, to December 1, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom One of the above-reference Court. before Judge Stephen G. Larson (am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hudson Insurance Company v. Colony Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hudson Insurance Company
Represented By:	Eric R Little
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Colony Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?