C.L. Jackson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| C L Jackson |
| Brice, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Veterans Affairs and Webb |
| 5:2008cv00541 |
| April 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 28 , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 22 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, includ ing the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that (1) Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted; (3) any common law tort causes of action are dismissed without prejudice; (4) the Bivens cause of action is dismissed with prejudice as to (a) Defendant United States of America, (b) Defendant U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, (c) Officer Webb in his official capacity, and (d) Officer Brice in his official capacity; and (5) Plaintiff's request for a stay is denied. (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
