John-Robert Sorensen et al v. In Rem "Notice of Lien" by John A Clarke et al
| Odell-Ammon Broom III, Jane Doe, John Doe, Jan-Marie Shieberl, John-Robert Sorensen and Linda Wen-Kwang Wang |
| Defendant Alhambra Police Department, Leroy D Baca, Irma Barrios, John E Bouzane, Jesus Contreras, Court of Common Pleas Adams County, Thomas Detelich, Jane Doe, John Doe, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, William P Foley, II, HSBC Bank USA NA, Household Finance Corporation of California, Housekey Financial Corporation, Grace Hsu, In Rem "Notice of Lien" by John A Clarke, Knoxville County General Sessions Court, Paul Lawrence, Lisa Lench, Magistrate Court of Gwinnette County, Priority Posting and Publishing, Respondent Superior, Betty Schwab, Mike Sulya, Superior Court of California - Contra Costa County, Evgeny Swarovski and Swarovski Financial |
| 5:2008cv01142 |
| January 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| Jeffrey W. Johnson |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: This Court granted the motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint of defendant Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa 92 without leave to amend and the complaint dismissed with prejudice as to this defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action be dismissed against defendant Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, and that this defendant recover its costs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
105
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: This Court granted the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff Leroy D. Baca and the County of Los Angeles 69 without leave to amend, and the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to these defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action be dismissed againstDefendants Los Angeles County Sheriff Leroy D. Baca and the County of Los Angeles. (gk)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Response to Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution due by 4/7/2009 as to defendants Mike Sulya, Predicate Action; Officer, Priority Posting and Publishing; Swarovski Financial, Predicate Actor; E vgeny Swarovski, Predicate Actor; Court of Common Pleas Adam County; Knoxville County General Sessions Court; Superior Court of California - Contra Costa County; and Priority Posting and Publishing, only. Pursuant to the Court's Orders dated 11/24/08 and 2/23/09, defendants Judge Lisa B. Lench, the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and Magistrate Court of Gwinnett County are hereby ordered dismissed from Plaintiff's First Amended Petition. (pp)
|
|
Filing
88
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: This Court granted the motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint against defendant Alhambra Police Department 70 without leave to amend and the complaint dismissed with prejudice as to this defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action be dismissed against defendant ALHAMBRA POLICE DEPARTMENT and that this defendant recovers its costs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
84
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder Re: Defendants County of Los Angeles and Sheriff Leroy D. Baca's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 69 ; Defendants William P. Foley II and Fidelity Nationa l Title Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 66 ; Defendant Alhambra Police Department's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 70 ; and Defendants' HSBC Bank USA, N.A., P aul Lawrence, Thomas Detelich, Betty Schwab, Household Finance Corporation of California, Irma Barrios, Jesus Contreras, and Housekey Financial Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 72 . The Court hereby strik es plaintiffs' second amended complaint 77 because it was filed without leave of Court. Defendants' motions to dismiss are hereby GRANTED with prejudice because "the allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading c ould not possibly cure the deficiency." Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint has failed to cure any of the deficiencies identified by this Court and it appears that plaintiffs' claims are essentially a collateral attack on a state court judgment. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: This Court granted the motion to dismiss 43 without leave to amend and the complaint was dismissed with prejudice as to these defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action be dismissed against defe ndants the Honorable Lisa B. Lench, Judge of the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, John Clarke, Executive Officer and Clerk of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and that these defendants recover their costs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder:, RE:DEFENDANTS HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; PAUL LAWRENCE; THOMAS DETELICH; BETTY SCHWAB;HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA; IRMA BARRIOS; JESUS CONTRERAS &HOUSEKEY FINANCIAL CORPORATI ONS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SO-CALLED PETITION 32 . Court hereby GRANTS defendants motion to dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint curing the defects noted herein within 30 days after the filing of this order. In the event that plaintiffs do not to amend their complaint within 30 days, this order will operate as a dismissal with prejudice.Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (lc) Modified on 10/27/2008 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
