Juan Martinez v. Ben Curry
Petitioner: Juan Martinez
Respondent: Ben Curry
Case Number: 5:2008cv01222
Filed: September 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, In accordance with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan Martinez v. Ben Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ben Curry
Represented By: David Delgado-Rucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?