Jessie C Chermak v. Michael J Astrue

Jessie C Chermak v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Jessie C Chermak
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2008cv01471
Filed:	February 22, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge:	Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2010	Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Judge Manuel L. Real Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation"), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's counsel, as Plaintiff's a ssignee, shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") in the amount of THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($3,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(d), subject ot the trms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (mp)
February 22, 2010	Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 18 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered reversing and remanding this matter for further proceedings. (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2010

Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Judge Manuel L. Real Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation"), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's counsel, as Plaintiff's a ssignee, shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") in the amount of THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($3,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(d), subject ot the trms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (mp)

February 22, 2010

Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 18 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered reversing and remanding this matter for further proceedings. (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jessie C Chermak v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Paul H Sachelari
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie C Chermak
Represented By:	Bill LaTour
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?