Tina Lavon Thompson v. K. Eichenberger

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Tina Lavon Thompson v. K. Eichenberger

Tina Lavon Thompson v. K. Eichenberger

Petitioner:	Tina Lavon Thompson
Respondent:	K Eichenberger
Case Number:	5:2008cv01675
Filed:	November 19, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County:	San Bernardino
Presiding Judge:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	Walsh
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 9, 2011	Filing 45 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 44 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
November 17, 2009	Filing 33 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadin gs filed in support of and in opposition to Respondents motion to dismiss the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judges Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions and orders that Respondents motion to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. (rp)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 9, 2011

Filing 45 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 44 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)

November 17, 2009

Filing 33 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadin gs filed in support of and in opposition to Respondents motion to dismiss the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judges Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions and orders that Respondents motion to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. (rp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tina Lavon Thompson v. K. Eichenberger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tina Lavon Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: K Eichenberger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?