Terry Lee Bell v. Lydia C Hense

Terry Lee Bell v. Lydia C Hense

Petitioner:	Terry Lee Bell
Respondent:	Lydia C Hense
Case Number:	5:2008cv01913
Filed:	January 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge:	Virginia A. Phillips
Presiding Judge:	Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 20, 2015	Filing 53 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the above-captioned actions are dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 52 (sbou)
January 4, 2010	Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Virginia A. Phillips for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 22 : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1. The Motion for Stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S. Ct. 1528, 161 L. Ed. 2d 440 (2005 ), is DENIED.2. Petitioners request to dismiss claims three and four of the Petition is GRANTED.3. Claims three and four of the Petition are DISMISSED without prejudice.4. Petitioners request for a stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003), overruled on other grounds by Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2007), is DENIED.5.Respondent is ORDERED to file an Answer or other response to the Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (dhl)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 20, 2015

Filing 53 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the above-captioned actions are dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 52 (sbou)

January 4, 2010

Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Virginia A. Phillips for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 22 : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1. The Motion for Stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 125 S. Ct. 1528, 161 L. Ed. 2d 440 (2005 ), is DENIED.2. Petitioners request to dismiss claims three and four of the Petition is GRANTED.3. Claims three and four of the Petition are DISMISSED without prejudice.4. Petitioners request for a stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003), overruled on other grounds by Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2007), is DENIED.5.Respondent is ORDERED to file an Answer or other response to the Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (dhl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terry Lee Bell v. Lydia C Hense
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terry Lee Bell
Represented By:	Thaddeus Julian Culpepper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Lydia C Hense
Represented By:	David Delgado-Rucci
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?