Center for Biological Diversity et al v. US Fish & Wildlife Service et al
| San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley |
| Dirk Kempthorne and US Fish & Wildlife Service |
| 5:2009cv00090 |
| January 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| Anne E. Thompson |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 Endangered Species Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Anne E. Thompson, re MOTION for Summary Judgment 22 , MOTION for Summary Judgment as to All Claims 26 . ORDERED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of Plaintiffs; and it is further ORDERED that the Designation of Critical Habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), 73 Fed. Reg. 61936 (Oct. 17, 2008), is VACATED; and it is further ORDERED that the Final Designation of Critical Habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, 67 Fed. Reg. 19812 (Apr. 23, 2002) , is REINSTATED; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service with instructions to consider a second revised designation of final critical habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
