Michael O DeVaughn v. Stanley Sniff
Petitioner: Michael O DeVaughn
Respondent: Stanley Sniff
Case Number: 5:2009cv00134
Filed: January 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County: Riverside
Presiding Judge: Fischer
Presiding Judge: Hillman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer,IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and the action is dismissed. Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations 30 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael O DeVaughn v. Stanley Sniff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stanley Sniff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael O DeVaughn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?