Thomas Mackey v. County of San Bernardino et al
| Thomas Mackey |
| County of San Bernardino, Gary Penrod, Morris Brickley, Palomino, Doug Wolfe, Gabriel Padilla, Don Dougan, Alan Girard, Robert McCoy, John Walker, Caesar Alban and Jane Doe |
| 5:2009cv01124 |
| June 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Wu |
| Mumm |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
221
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of defendants County of San Bernardino, Gary Penrod, Morris Brickley, Palomino, Don Dougan, Alan Girard, Robert McCoy, John Walker, Ceasar Alban Gabriel Padilla and Doug Wolfe, and that they be awarded any statutorily recoverable and reasonably incurred costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
|
|
Filing
107
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONTROL AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL PEACE OFFICER RECORDS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT]. (kca)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge George H Wu: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in favor of defendants Brickley, Palomino, Dougan, Girard, McC oy, Walker, Alban, and Doe, and these defendants and the claims involving kicking, rough handling, exposure to asphalt, and a cover-up are dismissed; and (2) defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the claims of excessive force by defendants Wolfe and Padilla for shooting plaintiff is denied. (ad)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. On June 18, 2009, plaintiff was granted permission pursuant to 28 USC 1915(b)(1) to file the above-referenced action without paying the full filing fee of $350.00, butplaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee, in the amount of $5.00, within thirty(30) days to the Clerk of Court. To date, the payment has not been received. The plaintiff has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) and is hereby ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiffs failure timely to pay the initial partial filing fee. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym:, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED. Both parties are ordered to submit the ordered status report and to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court order by December 14, 2011 (SEE MINUTES FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
