Jane Doe 1 et al v. Spearmint Rhino Companies Worldwide Inc et al
| Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 1 |
| Oxnard Hospitality Services LP, K-Kel Inc, Spearmint Rhino Companies Worldwide Inc and Spearmint Rhino Consulting Worldwide Inc |
| 5:2009cv01316 |
| July 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Bristow |
| Phillips |
| Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
343
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to the Court's order approving the class action settlement. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)
|
|
Filing
337
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (DOC. NO. 317) AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES (DOC. NO. 311) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the Dancers' Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and their Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Incentive Awards. The Dancers are hereby awarded $2,301,024.50 in fees, $73,270.77 in costs, and incentive payments as enumerated in the preceding section. 311 317 (am) Modified on 10/5/2012 (am).
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow granting Stipulation for Protective Order 114 . The Court, having considered the Stipulation Re: Protective Order attached hereto as Exhibit 1 filed and executed by Plaintiffs and Defendants, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby GRANTS and ENTERS a Protective Order consistent with and incorporating the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order executed by the parties. (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
