Marilou Tibon et al v. DHI Mortgage - Phoenix Sub Prime Ltd LP et al
| Marilou Tibon and Jaime Tibon |
| DHI Mortgage - Phoenix Sub Prime Ltd LP, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, HSBC Mortgage Corporation, D R Horton Inc, Linda Rachele and DOES |
| 5:2009cv01857 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Hillman |
| Phillips |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendants DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd., L.P., D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. and Linda Rachele's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief Can Be Granted 10 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendants DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd. L.P. (erroneously sued as DHI Mortgage Phoenix Sub Prime, Ltd., L.P.), D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. (erroneously sued as D.R. Horton, Inc.), and Linda Rachele is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED thatPlaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant HSBC Mortgage Corporation is DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
