Elliot Reyes v. Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff: Elliot Reyes
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 5:2009cv01908
Filed: October 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County: San Bernardino
Presiding Judge: Turchin
Presiding Judge: Turchin
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 OPINION THAT THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION IS SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND IS FREE FROM MATERIAL LEGAL ERROR. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE COMMISSIONER by Magistrate Judge Carolyn Turchin (dam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliot Reyes v. Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elliot Reyes
Represented By: William M Kuntz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?