Marlon E. Rojas v. Michael J. Astrue

Marlon E. Rojas v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Marlon E Rojas
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2009cv01971
Filed:	October 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Eastern Division - Riverside Office
County:	San Bernardino
Presiding Judge:	Kenton
Presiding Judge:	Snyder
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 29, 2010	Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees (Stipulation), and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/100s ($3,200.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 18 (lmh)
September 13, 2010	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 16 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and the matter is remanded for a new hearing consistent with the Memorandum Opinion. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rp)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 29, 2010

Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees (Stipulation), and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/100s ($3,200.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 18 (lmh)

September 13, 2010

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 16 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and the matter is remanded for a new hearing consistent with the Memorandum Opinion. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marlon E. Rojas v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlon E Rojas
Represented By:	Shanny J Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?