Mouafac Touma et al v. Wachovia Mortgage FSB et al
| Mouafac Touma and Faris Haddad |
| Wells Fargo Mortgage Inc, Jerry Smolar, David Moskowitz, Kevin R McCarthy, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Mike Heid, James E Maynor, Wachovia Mortgage FSB, Quality Loan Services, Karla Sanches, Does and Alvin M Brown |
| 5:2010cv00681 |
| May 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Virginia A. Phillips |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 21 . IT IS ORDEREDAND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint againstDefendants Wachovia Mortgage FSB, Alvin Brown, JamesMaynor, David Moskowitz, Mike Heid, Jerry Smolar, andMortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, Southwest, N.A., formerly known asWachovia Mortgage, FSB, and successor by merger to Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
