Jeremy Pinson v. Pablo Prieto
Plaintiff: Jeremy Pinson
Defendant: Pablo Prieto
Case Number: 5:2010cv00811
Filed: June 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 461 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: This action came for trial before the court and a jury, the Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge, presiding. The issues having been tried, the jury having rendered its verdict in favor of defen dants Pablo Prieto, Joshua Halstead, and Joseph Norwood, and the court having previously dismissed defendant Federal Bureau of Prisons and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Richard Bourn and Robert McFadden, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED t hat plaintiff Jeremy Pinson take nothing, and that Judgment is entered in favor of defendants. Defendants shall recover of plaintiff their reasonably incurred costs of the action pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920 and Local Civil Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 329 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: [NOTE CHANGE MADE BY THE COURT IN PARAGRAPH 6.3] (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. On September 17, 2010, plaintiff was granted permission pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) to file the above-referenced action without paying the full filing fee of $350.00, but plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee, in the amount of $ 3.50, within thirty (30) days to the Clerk of Court. To date, the payment has not been received. The plaintiff has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) and is hereby ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiffs failure timely to pay the initial partial filing fee. (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeremy Pinson v. Pablo Prieto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Pinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pablo Prieto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?