Warren Arlen Harris v. General Motors Overseas Distribution
Plaintiff: Warren Arlen Harris
Defendant: General Motors Overseas Distribution
Case Number: 5:2010cv00920
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rosalyn M. Chapman
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Terminated Case, 15 . Pursuant to the Order filed on January 26, 2011, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren Arlen Harris v. General Motors Overseas Distribution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Arlen Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Overseas Distribution
Represented By: David M Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?