Aurelio Martin Sepulveda v. James Lee
| Aurelio Martin Sepulveda |
| RN Combs, LVN Johnson, James Lee, LVN Morales, MD J Obaiza, LVN Tennefos, Supervising RN II M Tolentino and MD N Williams, - |
| 5:2010cv01705 |
| November 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 90 . JUDGMENT IS HEREBY entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 66 is DENIED. The Court refers the remainder of plaintiff's outstanding requests and motions to Magistrate Judge Walsh for ruling. (gk)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Repor t and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, 34 . (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
