Charlie Lincoln et al v. Lowe's Companies Inc et al
| Charlie Lincoln and Mark Lincoln |
| Does, Lowe's Companies Inc, Lowe's HIW Inc and Lowe's Management Services Inc |
| 5:2010cv01840 |
| November 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| P.I.: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A Kronstadt, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 40 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
|
Filing
39
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Judge John A Kronstadt. On December 5, 2011, plaintiff and defendant each filed a Status Report 37 , 38 indicating that a settlement has been reached. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for January 23, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. If the parties file a dismissal by January 19, 2012, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel will be required. The Status Conference and Motion 26 set for December 12, 2011, January 30, 2012 Final Pretrial Conference, February 10, 2012 Exhibit Conference, and February 14, 2012 Trial are vacated. (lom)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PARTIES' STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OPINION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (See Order for details.) 18 (afe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
