Donald Macleod v. Emerson Electric Co et al
| Does, Emerson Electric Co, Emerson Retail Services Inc and Todd Zimmerman |
| Donald Macleod |
| 5:2011cv00159 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
267
JUDGMENT RE: ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Pending Motions, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED that defendant Emerson Retail Services, Inc. shall pay plaintiff's attorney's fees in the amount of $304,273.75 and non-taxable costs in the amount of $11,814.20. (gk)
|
|
Filing
225
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the jury's verdict, IT IS ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Plaintiff Donald MacLeod shall recover from defendant Emerson Retail Services, Inc., the amount of $101,565.52 for unpaid overtime compensa tion,$8,750.00 in waiting time penalties, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $49,090.00, for a total of $159,405.52. Post-judgment interest shall be at the rate of 10%. Costs and attorney's fees shall be determined at a later time. (2) Counterclaim plaintiff Emerson Retail Services, Inc. shall recover nothing on its counterclaims. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
52
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Entry of Protective Order 51 (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
