Antonio J Hollis v. City of Redlands et al
Antonio J Hollis |
City of Redlands and Jennifer Ontiveros |
5:2011cv00536 |
April 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
S. James Otero |
Sheri Pym |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge S. James Otero for Notice of Report and Recommendation 42 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 43 (am) |
Filing 27 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. On April 7, 2011, plaintiff was granted permission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) to file the above-referenced action without payi ng the full filing fee of $350.00, but plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee, in the amount of $0.41, within thirty (30) days to the Clerk of Court. To date, the payment has not been received. The plaintiff has not complied with 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) and is hereby ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiffs failure timely to pay the initial partial filing fee. (mrgo) |
Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED. Plaintiff is ordered to submit the ordered status report and to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court order by March 6, 2012 (SEE MINUTES FOR DETAILS). (kca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.