Petra Ann Parker v. Employment & Training Agency (SBETA) et al
| Petra Ann Parker |
| US Census Bureau and Employment & Training Agency (SBETA) |
| 5:2011cv00653 |
| April 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PLAINTIFF show cause in writing not later than June 5, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant US CENSUS BUREAU. SEE ORDER. (im)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant EDD at Work Source's Motion to Dismiss 36 . The First Amended Complaint, which first named EDD, is untimely because it was filed more than 90 days after plaintiff re ceived her right to sue letter from the EEOC. Because no amendment of the complaint will make plaintiff's action against EDD timely, dismissal with prejudice is appropriate. The Court dismisses defendant EDD from this case with prejudice. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant San Bernardino Employment and Training Agency's Motion to Dismiss 14 is granted. Plaintiff shall have 45 days to file an amended complaint. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
