Charolette K. Debello v. Michael J. Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Charolette K. Debello v. Michael J. Astrue

Charolette K. Debello v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Charlotte K Debello
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2011cv00810
Filed:	May 24, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 19, 2012	Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 (lmh)
June 4, 2012	Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. Related to: Complaint - (Social Security) 1 , Memorandum & Opinion, 18 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 19, 2012

Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 (lmh)

June 4, 2012

Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. Related to: Complaint - (Social Security) 1 , Memorandum & Opinion, 18 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charolette K. Debello v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Timothy R Bolin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlotte K Debello
Represented By:	Denise Bourgeois Haley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?