Robert Deane Schwartz v. Domingo Uribe Jr et al
| Robert Deane Schwartz |
| Mathew Cate and Domingo Uribe, Jr. |
| 5:2011cv01174 |
| July 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Jacqueline H. Nguyen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, in favor of Domingo Uribe, Jr, Mathew Cate against Robert Deame Schwartz Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 174 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 66 ; and Denying Petitioner's Request for Appointment of Counsel for Purpose of an Evidentiary Hearin g: (See document for details.) THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Second Amended Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies unless, within thirty (30) days, petitioner files a n otice of withdrawal of the following unexhausted claims (numbered in accordance with the breakdown set forth in the Magistrate Judge's May 30,2012 Order re Further Proceedings): 2(b), 2(c), 2(e), 2(g), 3(d), 4(b), 5(a), 5(c), 6(a), 7(c), and 7(f). (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
