Richard Hernandez v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Richard Hernandez v. Michael J Astrue

Richard Hernandez v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Richard Hernandez
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2011cv01396
Filed:	September 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge:	S. James Otero
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 1, 2013	Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, re 28 .It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Commissioner's final decision is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Order pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (twdb)
May 29, 2012	Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, Plaintiff filed his proof of service indicating service on the Commissioner of Social Security c/o the Office of Regional Counsel on 1/17/12, and service on the U.S. Attorney on 1/23/12. However, it does not appear that proper service has actually been effectuated upon the Attorney General. The parties have failed to further comply with the Courts Case Management Order (CMO) 7 . Accordingly, the parties are hereby ordered to file a Joint Status Report as directed by the CMO on or before June 7, 2012. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for want of prosecution and disobedience with Court orders. (rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 1, 2013

Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, re 28 .It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the Commissioner's final decision is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Order pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (twdb)

May 29, 2012

Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, Plaintiff filed his proof of service indicating service on the Commissioner of Social Security c/o the Office of Regional Counsel on 1/17/12, and service on the U.S. Attorney on 1/23/12. However, it does not appear that proper service has actually been effectuated upon the Attorney General. The parties have failed to further comply with the Courts Case Management Order (CMO) 7 . Accordingly, the parties are hereby ordered to file a Joint Status Report as directed by the CMO on or before June 7, 2012. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for want of prosecution and disobedience with Court orders. (rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Hernandez v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Hernandez
Represented By:	Frederick J Daley, Jr
Represented By:	Harvey P Sackett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?