Elonza Jesse Tyler v. James D Hartley
Petitioner: Elonza Jesse Tyler
Respondent: James D Hartley
Case Number: 5:2011cv01714
Filed: October 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 15 . It is hereby adjudged that petitioners challenge to his 1997 conviction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; petitioners challenge the execution of his sentence is dismissed as untimely; and petitioners challenge to the Boards denial of parole is denied.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elonza Jesse Tyler v. James D Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Elonza Jesse Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James D Hartley
Represented By: Kathleen R Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?