Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis v. Warden

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis v. Warden

Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis v. Warden

Petitioner:	Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis
Respondent:	Warden
Case Number:	5:2012cv00464
Filed:	March 30, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge:	Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2012	Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS TIME-BARRED by Judge Otis D Wright, II, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 : (See document for details.) Court finds the F AP is time-barred. Further, by way of the OSC, the Court finds Petitioner has received notice and an adequate opportunity to show cause why the F AP should not be dismissed as time-barred. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the reference to the magistrate judge is vacated and the F AP is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice and notifying Petitioner of said judgment. Any and all pending motions are terminated. (rla)
May 16, 2012	Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato re Dismissal of First Amended Petition. Petitioner shall have until 6/5/2012 to file a written response and show cause why his First Amended Petition should not be dismissed with prejudice as being time-barred. (ts)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2012

Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS TIME-BARRED by Judge Otis D Wright, II, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 : (See document for details.) Court finds the F AP is time-barred. Further, by way of the OSC, the Court finds Petitioner has received notice and an adequate opportunity to show cause why the F AP should not be dismissed as time-barred. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the reference to the magistrate judge is vacated and the F AP is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice and notifying Petitioner of said judgment. Any and all pending motions are terminated. (rla)

May 16, 2012

Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato re Dismissal of First Amended Petition. Petitioner shall have until 6/5/2012 to file a written response and show cause why his First Amended Petition should not be dismissed with prejudice as being time-barred. (ts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis v. Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Vasilis Fotiou Sakellaridis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?