Antonio Goode v. Michael J. Astrue

Antonio Goode v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Antonio Goode
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2012cv00608
Filed:	April 23, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge:	Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 10, 2013	Filing 18 STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Eq ual Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($4,350.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). 17 [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)
February 7, 2013	Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, Related to: Order, 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Decision and Order. 3 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 10, 2013

Filing 18 STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Eq ual Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($4,350.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). 17 [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)

February 7, 2013

Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, Related to: Order, 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Decision and Order. 3 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antonio Goode v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Susan L Smith
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Goode
Represented By:	Bill LaTour
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?