De'veron J Ratliff v. Elin Vanlenzuela
Petitioner: Deveron J Ratliff
Respondent: Elin Vanlenzuela
Case Number: 5:2012cv00785
Filed: May 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym:, Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed as Being Barred by the One-Year Statute of Limitations or as Being Barred by AEDPAs Limitation on Successive Petitions. The court hereby ORDERS petitioner to show cause in writing by June 18, 2012 (SEE MINUTES FOR DETAILS). (kca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De'veron J Ratliff v. Elin Vanlenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elin Vanlenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Deveron J Ratliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?