Alexander Soroka v. Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Alexander Soroka
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 5:2012cv01163
Filed: July 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, Related to: Complaint (1) Pursuant to the order of the court accepting the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings. (23) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander Soroka v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander Soroka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?