Benjamin Medina v. Ron Barnes
Petitioner: Benjamin M Medina
Respondent: Ron Barnes
Case Number: 5:2012cv01192
Filed: July 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 29 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (bem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benjamin Medina v. Ron Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin M Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ron Barnes
Represented By: Daniel Brian Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?