Brandon Thomas v. State of California, et al.,
Plaintiff: Brandon Thomas
Defendant: M. Alexi, R. Bandholtz, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, A. Kefalianos, J. Poffer, State of California and Cynthia Tampkins
Case Number: 5:2012cv01207
Filed: July 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: J. Spencer Letts
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 57 filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
December 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts November 12, 2013, Order, which required him to file on or before November 26, 2013, (1) a Notice of Submission and copies of the USM-285 forms, and (2) the IFP Request form. Plaintiff shall respond to this Order to Show Cause in writing on or before December 27, 2013. [See Order for details.] (san)
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure t o comply with the Courts April 18, 2013, Orders, which required him to file on or before May 2, 2013, (1) a Notice of Submission and copies of the USM-285 forms, and (2) the Prison Trust Account Withdrawal Authorization form. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/23/2013. See order for details. (jy)
April 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge J. Spencer Letts, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Cynthia Tompkins shall be dismissed without leave to amend, and (2) the Clerk shall issue the appropriate orders regarding service of the Second Amended Complaint on Defendant A. Kefalianos by the United States Marshal. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 22 (lmh)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott 6 , 10 . The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TOAMEND. If Plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, which remedies the deficiencies discussed above. Plaintiff must name separately each individual defendant against whom he brings his claims, identify clearly the factual basis for each of his claims, and articulate the connection between each named defendant and each claim. [See Order for further details.] (san)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandon Thomas v. State of California, et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Alexi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Bandholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Kefalianos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Poffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Tampkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?