Gail Holmes v. Hospira Inc et al
| Gail Holmes |
| Pfizer Inc, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Inc, Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Parke-Davis, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Does, Hospira Inc and Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc |
| Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc |
| 5:2012cv01708 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Virginia A. Phillips |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC (ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC); AND JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.; ORTHOMCNEIL-PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.; AND JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC.)by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendants Johnson & Johnson; Janssen Research & Development, LLC (erroneously sued as Johns on & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC); and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (erroneously sued as Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Ortho-McNeil-Pharmaceutical, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
