Willietta French v. Michael J Astrue

Willietta French v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Willietta French
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2012cv01798
Filed:	October 17, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge:	George H Wu
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2014	Filing 26 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 25 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and P ayment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,900.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (bem)
December 18, 2013	Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 22 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 4 2 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem) (Main Document 23 replaced on 12/19/2013) (bem).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2014

Filing 26 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 25 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and P ayment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,900.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (bem)

December 18, 2013

Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 22 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 4 2 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem) (Main Document 23 replaced on 12/19/2013) (bem).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willietta French v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willietta French
Represented By:	Bill LaTour
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?