Tobias A Frank v. Derrick Schultz et al
| Tobias A Frank |
| R Byrd, Juan D Castillo and Derrick Schultz |
| 5:2012cv01848 |
| October 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, Related to: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 81 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mr)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's access to the courts claim against Defendant Derrick Schultz in Claim One is DISMISSED WI TH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 2. Plaintiff's equal protection claim against Defendant Rosie Byrd in Claim Three is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 3. This action may proceed only on the Second Amended Complaint's retaliation claim against Defendant Schultz in Claim Two and due process claim against Defendant Byrd in Claim Four. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
