Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 v. Commercial Wood Products Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 v. Commercial Wood Products Company

Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 v. Commercial Wood Products Company

Plaintiff:	Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721
Defendant:	Commercial Wood Products Company
Case Number:	5:2012cv01932
Filed:	November 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Oswald Parada
Presiding Judge:	Terry J. Hatter
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2013	Filing 77 AMENDED JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED BY ARBITRATOR PHILLIP TAMOUSH by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 against Commercial Wood Products Company in the principal amount of $18,256.88, interest in the amount of $2,860.09, attorneys fees of $13,940.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $35,082.97. Related to: Judgment, 17 . (See document for specifics) (mrgo)
February 28, 2013	Filing 17 JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED BY ARBITRATOR PHILIP TAMOUSH IN FAVOR OF CARPENTERS LOCAL 721 AND AGAINST COMMERCIAL WOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: in the principal amount of $18,256.88, interest in the amount of $1060.40, for a total judgment of $21,151.97. Related to: Order on Application for Default Judgment 16 . IT IS SO ADJUDGED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2013

Filing 77 AMENDED JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED BY ARBITRATOR PHILLIP TAMOUSH by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 against Commercial Wood Products Company in the principal amount of $18,256.88, interest in the amount of $2,860.09, attorneys fees of $13,940.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $35,082.97. Related to: Judgment, 17 . (See document for specifics) (mrgo)

February 28, 2013

Filing 17 JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED BY ARBITRATOR PHILIP TAMOUSH IN FAVOR OF CARPENTERS LOCAL 721 AND AGAINST COMMERCIAL WOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: in the principal amount of $18,256.88, interest in the amount of $1060.40, for a total judgment of $21,151.97. Related to: Order on Application for Default Judgment 16 . IT IS SO ADJUDGED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721 v. Commercial Wood Products Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cabinet Makers Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721
Represented By:	Yuliya S Mirzoyan
Represented By:	Desmond C Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commercial Wood Products Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?