Timothy Wayne Sherow Sr v. Paul Brazelton

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Timothy Wayne Sherow Sr v. Paul Brazelton

Timothy Wayne Sherow Sr v. Paul Brazelton

Petitioner:	Timothy Wayne Sherow
Respondent:	Paul Brazelton
Case Number:	5:2013cv00060
Filed:	January 8, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge:	Stephen J. Hillman
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2013	Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
June 24, 2013	Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: re: Report and Recommendation (Issued), 16 . The Court adopts the Magistrate Judges conclusion in the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (R&R) that all three claims in the instant federal habeas petition should be dismissed, essentially for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge with clarifications. ( see minute order for further details). (sbu) Modified on 6/25/2013 (sbu).

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2013

Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)

June 24, 2013

Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: re: Report and Recommendation (Issued), 16 . The Court adopts the Magistrate Judges conclusion in the well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (R&R) that all three claims in the instant federal habeas petition should be dismissed, essentially for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge with clarifications. ( see minute order for further details). (sbu) Modified on 6/25/2013 (sbu).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timothy Wayne Sherow Sr v. Paul Brazelton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Wayne Sherow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Brazelton
Represented By:	Kelley Ann Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?