Kailyn Patti v. Randall Nelson Smallcanyon et al
| Kailyn Patti |
| Randall Nelson Smallcanyon, Credit Acceptance Corp, Does and Danelle Robin Smallcanyon |
| 5:2013cv00256 |
| February 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A. Phillips |
| Sheri Pym |
| Motor Vehicle |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. On February 8, 2013, this action was removed to this Court. (Doc. No. 1 .) On March 11, 2013, Defendant Credit Acceptance was dismissed without prejudice for failure to oppose a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 8 .) Since that time, Plaintiff has failed to prosecute the remaining claims against Defendants Nelson and Robin Smallcanyon. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing, not later than May 29, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to file a timely response to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (adu)
|
|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against Defendant Credit Acceptance Corporation. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
