H Wayne Barber v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
| H Wayne Barber |
| Riverside County, California Reconveyance Company, Does, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, Derek Wear-Renee and Washington Mutual Bank |
| 5:2013cv00441 |
| March 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G. Bernal |
| Oswald Parada |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 13 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (adu)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Riverside County. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/27/2013.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Pursuant to the Order filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, California Reconveyance Company, Washington Mutual Bank, and Derek Wear-Renee are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
