Davalan Sales Inc et al v. So Cal Fresh Choice Inc et al
| Davalan Sales Inc |
| So Cal Fresh Choice Inc and Mahmood N Jafary |
| 5:2013cv00550 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Virginia A. Phillips |
| Agriculture Acts |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Pursuant to the Minute Order filed herewith 14 :, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs Dalavan Sales Inc, a corporation, and Dalavan Sales Inc, a corporation doing busine ss as The Banana Company (Plaintiffs), against Defendants So. Cal. Fresh Choice Inc, a corporation and doing business as Upland Farmers Market, and Mahmood N. Jafary, an individual (Defendants). The Court orders that such judgment be entered. Pursu ant to this Judgment, Defendants are ordered to pay Plaintiffs: (1) damages in the principal amount of $$13,286.05 (the "Principal Amount"); (2) pre-judgment interest on the Principal Amount through and including July 19, 2013 in the amount of $4,305.22; (3) prejudgment interest on the Principal Amount from July 19, 2013 to the day of judgment at the rate of $6.55 per day; (4) post-judgment interest on the Principal Amount at the rate of 18% per annum; (5) costs in the amount of $566.36; and (6) attorneys fees in the amount of $1,397.16. Defendants are subject to joint and several liability. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
