Shuttle Bus Leasing v. Edison Transportation LLC et al
| Shuttle Bus Leasing |
| Does, Edison Transportation LLC, GDUS Inc, Gameday Management Group Inc, Robert Hill, Itransit Inc, Michael Pouncey, Lewis Robbins and Anthony Vitrano |
| 5:2013cv00675 |
| April 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Oswald Parada |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi: On the Court's own motion, and in light of the parties' settlement, the Court hereby ORDERS the above-captioned matter DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kh)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Plaintiff's request to continue the OSC deadline is GRANTED. sixty days of the date of this Order, all parties are ORDERED T O SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and/or prosecute. The parties are cautioned that failure to timely file a response will be deemed by the Court as consent to the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Alternatively, should the parties file a Stipulation of Dismissal prior to the deadline, they need not respond separately to this OSC. (kh)
|
|
Filing
74
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. On October 31, 2014, the Court ordered the parties to file a settlement status report and submit a proposed status conference date. [Dkt. No. 72. ] To date, the parties have done neither. Accordingly, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, all parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and/or prosecute. (kh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
