DeAnthony George Wilson v. Frederick Foulk

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District DeAnthony George Wilson v. Frederick Foulk

DeAnthony George Wilson v. Frederick Foulk

Petitioner:	DeAnthony George Wilson
Respondent:	Frederick Foulk
Case Number:	5:2013cv01127
Filed:	June 24, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jesus G. Bernal
Presiding Judge:	Margaret A. Nagle
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 8, 2015	Filing 36 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), 1 , 35 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: (1) the Petition is granted with respect to the insufficiency of the evidence claim in Ground One directed at t he street terrorism conviction under California Penal Code §186.22(a); (2) the Petition is denied with prejudice with respect to Ground Two and the remainder of Ground One; and (3) Petitioner is discharged from all adverse consequences of his s treet terrorism conviction in San Bernardino Superior Court case No. FVI024734, vacating the portion of his sentence based thereon, and requiring the San Bernardino County Superior Court to resentence Petitioner accordingly within sixty (60) days of the entry of judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (san)
September 17, 2015	Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 30 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 8, 2015

Filing 36 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), 1 , 35 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: (1) the Petition is granted with respect to the insufficiency of the evidence claim in Ground One directed at t he street terrorism conviction under California Penal Code §186.22(a); (2) the Petition is denied with prejudice with respect to Ground Two and the remainder of Ground One; and (3) Petitioner is discharged from all adverse consequences of his s treet terrorism conviction in San Bernardino Superior Court case No. FVI024734, vacating the portion of his sentence based thereon, and requiring the San Bernardino County Superior Court to resentence Petitioner accordingly within sixty (60) days of the entry of judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (san)

September 17, 2015

Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 30 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeAnthony George Wilson v. Frederick Foulk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Frederick Foulk
Represented By:	Vincent P LaPietra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: DeAnthony George Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?