Elizabeth C. Stewart v. Stanley L. Sniff

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Elizabeth C. Stewart v. Stanley L. Sniff

Elizabeth C. Stewart v. Stanley L. Sniff

Plaintiff:	Elizabeth C. Stewart
Defendant:	Stanley L. Sniff
Case Number:	5:2013cv01153
Filed:	June 28, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Beverly Reid O'Connell
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2014	Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Action for Failure to Prosecute, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and the action is dismissed without prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
August 5, 2014	Filing 30 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, the other records on file herein, and the Report and R ecommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is to file a Second Amended Complaint as to her surviving claims within thirty days of this order. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2014

Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Action for Failure to Prosecute, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and the action is dismissed without prejudice (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)

August 5, 2014

Filing 30 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 29 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion, the other records on file herein, and the Report and R ecommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is to file a Second Amended Complaint as to her surviving claims within thirty days of this order. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elizabeth C. Stewart v. Stanley L. Sniff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth C. Stewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley L. Sniff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?