Julian Imperial Mendoza v. G I Janda
Petitioner: Julian Imperial Mendoza
Respondent: G I Janda
Case Number: 5:2013cv01379
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, in favor of G I Janda against Julian Imperial Mendoza Related to Report and Recommendation (Issued) 25 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, it is adjudged that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dfi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Julian Imperial Mendoza v. G I Janda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: G I Janda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Julian Imperial Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?