Pacific Solution Marketing Inc v. Master Cutlery Inc
Plaintiff: Pacific Solution Marketing Inc
Defendant: Master Cutlery Inc
Case Number: 5:2013cv01469
Filed: August 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Presiding Judge: Oswald Parada
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Judge John A. Kronstadt. 90 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 *NOTE: Changes Made By The Court* PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. *See attached Order.* (es)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacific Solution Marketing Inc v. Master Cutlery Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Master Cutlery Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pacific Solution Marketing Inc
Represented By: Benjamin Ashurov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?