Robert Elguezabal v. Tequila Hoppers Bar & Grill Inc et al
| Robert Elguezabal |
| Tequila Hoppers Bar & Grill Inc and Does |
| 5:2013cv02028 |
| November 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A. Phillips |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 22 : Having read the Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, this action is hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess: This case is currently scheduled for a Rule 26(f) conference on Monday, March 17, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. To date, the Court has not received a joint report as required by its order of January 23, 2014. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The response to this order must be filed with the Court no later than the close of business on Friday, March 21, 2014. FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THIS OSC WILL BE DEEMED CONSENT TO THE DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. The scheduling conference now set for March 17, 2014 is ORDERED OFF CALENDAR. re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference 14 . (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
