Rosendo Valencia Jr v. Bank of America NA et al
| Rosendo Valencia, Jr |
| Rancho Horizon LLC, Does, Country Wide Home Loans, Bank of America NA, All Persons Unknown Claiming and ReconTrust Company NA |
| 5:2013cv02073 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| David T. Bristow |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. In the present case, two different individuals are identified as the plaintiff in the Complaint. While the title of the Complaint names "Rosendo Valencia[,] Jr[.]" as the plaintiff, paragraph 2 of the Complaint alleges that "[a]t all times relevant herein, the Plaintiff, BENJAMIN CORONA, (Hereinafter referred as [sic] "Plaintiff")... resided at and continues to reside at... the Property and is the trueOwner of the Property. " Accordingly, the Court orders the plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10. In the alternative, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint, list ing the plaintiff's correct name in the title and throughout the body of the complaint. The plaintiff's response to this Order shall be filed by December 19, 2013. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this action. Refer to document for details of the Court's order. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
